The expectation of election has been upon us for some time now, and out of the media had come (and fled) the assertion that an election was inevitable this week. This seemed all but certain from the television and radio press in the final days before the resumption of parliament. Of course, with the unlikely pairing of the Bloc and the Conservatives, parliament will chug along for some time yet. The NDP have pitched in as well, supporting the conservatives on unemployment insurance reform, heretofore a Liberal demand.
Not too long ago, the Conservatives railed against the Liberals for agreeing to form a coalition with the NDP and the Bloc Quebecois, and now they govern with the support of the NDP and the Bloc. Not too long ago, the NDP slammed the Liberals for supporting (or abstaining from voting on) the Conservatives agenda. Now the most salient and key plank in their platform is a borrowed Liberal demand, and they actively vote for the Conservative agenda. The Liberals keep threatening a non confidence motion, a move that Canadians on the whole will likely not be supportive of.
The Conservatives continue the new-style politics of unleashing legislation on television, not in Parliament, and controlling the spin, leaving opposition playing catch-up. For example, look no farther than Harper’s most recent visit to New Brunswick to provide his update on stimulus spending. New Brunswick gets too few visitors not on their way to Nova Scotia but this is hardly a professional way to conduct parliament.
It’s getting to be all too much of a circus and it is a pathetic way to treat the Canadian public. A recent quote in the Globe and Mail from a former Harper advisor illustrates the level of respect for the intellect of the Canadian public endemic to these people:
“It doesn’t have to be true. It just has to be plausible…”
Tom Flanagan, University of Calgary Political Scientist, former Harper adviser.
Politics is, at present, about nothing more than the survival and growth of the party seats, at any cost, including the truth.
We’re not paying these people for theatre, we’re paying them to run the country. Since their acting is transparent to all but the most fawning of the party sycophants, perhaps they could try consensus and concession for a change. Let us judge their capabilities and have an election in due time. We’re Canadian, we’ll reward those who act in a manner we see as congruent with our values. Right now, there isn’t much to choose from.
If my theory is correct, then all the parties might stand to lose seats in Quebec, where Duceppe is willing to work for and support legislation on a case by case basis for the ridings his party represents.
What a concept.